|
|
The Social Anxiety Forums is an online community for people who suffer from social anxiety. Register or Login now to access all forums.
|
br>
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Anonymous

|
Posted: Thu December 14, 2006 Post subject: Sim Porn? |
|
|
Miami attorney Jack Thompson claims cheat codes make EA's life sim a pedophile's paradise by showing genitalia; calls for ban on T-rated game.
How do you like your hot coffee? If you're Jack Thompson, you like it scalding game publisher's laps. The Miami attorney and antigaming activist has done his share to see that games don't fall into the wrong hands. And lately, those hands have belonged to almost everyone.
Thompson was among those who spearheaded the recent effort to slap an "Adults Only" rating on Rockstar Games' Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, and he's often been on the forefront of many other gaming issues, several of which have targeted the crime-spree-based GTA franchise. In the past, he's represented defendants who have been the victims of GTA-inspired crimes, including the triple homicide of three police officers by an 18-year-old boy in Alabama.
His beef with San Andreas? Unused code in the game that depicts sexual acts. These minigames can be unlocked by using game-cheat devices or patches available on the Internet.
Thompson is on a roll...and he's not done yet. His latest goat is a game that doesn't involve guns, carjacking, or prostitutes: He's going after Electronic Arts' The Sims 2.
In a manifesto sent today to press outlets, Thompson focuses on dismantling the Entertainment Software Ratings Board and exposing what he calls the industry's "latest dirty little secret." The secret's out now, and it involves nude sims.
In the statement, Thompson says, "Sims 2, the latest version of the Sims video game franchise ... contains, according to video game news sites, full frontal nudity, including nipples, penises, labia, and pubic hair."
The Sims 2 is a "life simulator." In the game, players steer their digital beings around their cyberlives. Actions include everything from the spectacular (getting married, having children, receiving promotions at work) to the mundane (cooking microwaved meals, going to the bathroom, mopping the floor). Such activities, as in real life, sometimes require nudity. EA circumvents inappropriateness by "blurring" out the nether regions, almost to a comical sense.
Knowing that the game is popular among all ages, EA has even taken steps to ensure that Sims fans aren't exposed to indecent depictions. In the recent expansion pack, The Sims 2 University, gamers can send their teenage sims off to college. However, instead of packing the expansion with "keggers" and "reefer," EA chose to use juice and bubble blowers.
Thompson doesn't seem to care. He cites a cheat code that can remove the blur that covers the nether regions. "The nudity placed there by the publisher/maker, Electronic Arts, is accessed by the use of a simple code that removes what is called 'the blur' which obscures the genital areas. In other words, the game was released to the public by the manufacturer knowing that the full frontal nudity was resident on the game and would be accessed by use of a simple code widely provided on the Internet."
It's not just the adults that are liberated from their wardrobes. Sims kids can also be nudified, "much to the delight, one can be sure, of pedophiles around the globe who can rehearse, in virtual reality, for their abuse."
Were this to be true, Thompson would have his smoking gun, and EA would be forced to recall all copies of The Sims 2. However, it's what's under the blur that Thompson's after. And what happens when the blur is lifted? A simple mannequin-esque smooth body, according to EA.
Jeff Brown, vice president of corporate communications at EA, in response to the accusations, told GameSpot, "This is nonsense. We've reviewed 100 percent of the content. There is no content inappropriate for a teen audience. Players never see a nude sim. If someone with an extreme amount of expertise and time were to remove the pixels, they would see that the sims have no genitals. They appear like Ken and Barbie."
Thompson doesn't buy it. "The sex and the nudity are in the game. That's the point. The blur is an admission that even the 'Ken and Barbie' features should not be displayed. The blur can be disarmed. This is no different than what is in San Andreas, although worse."
[UPDATE] Thompson this afternoon updated his earlier statement, saying he is aware certain mods only remove "the blur," but adds that "Electronic Arts has done nothing about this." Thompson's new conclusion: EA is "cooperating, gleefully, with the mod community to turn Sims 2 into a porn offering."
The last time we checked, The Sims 2 was rated T for Teen by the ESRB, which means that anyone 13 years of age, with $50 to spend, can purchase the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anonymous

|
Posted: Thu December 14, 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
| Why would EA put genitalia in the Sims? I don't remember any of that in the original and I knew how to remove the blur in that too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh Site Admin

Joined: 15 Nov 2006 Posts: 1570 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Thu December 14, 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
| By the same logic he would have to ban Ken and Barbie dolls. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aramoor Gold VIP


Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 166 Location: S.Wales
|
Posted: Thu December 14, 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
Jack Thompson needs to be taken out the back and shot in the head. _________________ I embrace my desire to
feel the rhythm, to feel connected
enough to step aside and weep like a widow
to feel inspired, to fathom the power,
to witness the beauty, to bathe in the fountain,
to swing on the spiral
of our divinity and still be a human. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anonymous

|
Posted: Thu December 14, 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
| Hey, it's the gamer's fault for removing the blur and being exposed to anything that MAY lie underneath it anyway, so who the **** gives. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anonymous

|
Posted: Thu December 14, 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
| Garrett-Of-Cthulhu wrote: | | Hey, it's the gamer's fault for removing the blur and being exposed to anything that MAY lie underneath it anyway, so who the **** gives. | I agree. The Sims is a fun game (I have the Sims 2), and cheats are called cheats for a reason. You're not supposed to use them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hobo Dirty Mothertrucker

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 323 Location: Boonies
|
Posted: Fri December 15, 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder how much money Jack Thomson makes for doing this stuff. I bet he thinks it's a great way he can gain a lot of money, more than he thinks he wants to help keep violent/sexual games out of young childrens hands.
An experienced person can add mods/hacks/cheats to most games. I don't see what the problem is, if it is rated for teens. People ages 13 and up, should be able to handle seeing naked bodies if they happen to use the cheat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Social Anxiety Forums
 Page created in 0.111 seconds with 17 SQL queries
|